Search for: "United States v. Quinn"
Results 361 - 380
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Last summer, tech companies followed suit, with CEOs including Elon Musk signing an Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Chemical Weapons. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm
Quinn. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Judge Rodney Smith, the soon to be new federal judicial appointment by the President for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, denied Callado’s motion to dissolve the LPs, and Callado appealed. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am
The opposite was true in the United States, as Kahn Freund would often say. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:28 am
Look at its impact on every country that has it — including the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Opponents of the Act argue that this is like United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Nicklin J found that, because Ms Murray’s tweet was stated as fact, it had one meaning; the defence of truth failed. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Fingers crossed.But while we await developments in the Land of Lincoln, it's time to head back to the Lone Star State where the Court of Criminal Appeals, to the likely-surprise of nobody, issued its opinion this morning in State ex rel Lykos v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
An example is Ramos v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(IPKat) (IPKat) IPO launches ‘Supply Chain Toolkit’ best practice toolkit for avoiding fake goods entering business supply chains (IPKat) Welsh patent applications: the results are in (IPKat) United States US General Government blocks release of documents on secret IP enforcement treaty, ACTA (EFF) Potential names for Obama IP team swirl; WTO IP Chief ‘imminent’ (Intellectual Property Watch) John W Thompson leading candidate for… [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" Defendant argues that Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:26 pm
Collectively, they make a compelling case for change.In Shaw v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 2:20 am
". [28] There has been recent discussion about dual China-US product safety liabilities and there will be a congressional hearing on the findings of lead-tainted childrens' products. [29] Commerce Secretary Gutierrez has also publicly stated that there will be discussions about the United States' concerns with Chinese product safety at the APEC summit. [30] The Chinese government has also been hard at work; it announced new standards in safety reports for… [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]