Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
South Carolina Dep't of Corr., C/A No. 4:08-2955-CMC-TER, 2008 WL 4831484, at *1 n. 1 (D.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina; Bolling v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Back in 2003 the United States Supreme Court set out to decide in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Shortly following a Supreme Court ruling last week in Williams v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:19 am
Eubanks did not change the mailing address on his credit cards or bank statements to the Cayman Islands and, instead, they are mailed to his father’s address in South Carolina. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of South Carolina: State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 6:18 am
Child support in South Carolina is calculated pursuant to the income-shares model, which is the prevalent model of child support determination in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:54 am
The United States Court of Appeals has issued a decision in regards to U.S. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 5:05 am
South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319, 324 (2006) (quoting Crane v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:08 am
Crocker (University of South Carolina School of Law) has posted The Political Fourth Amendment (Washington University Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 2, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Thus, not only would proponents of liberal constitutional change need to secure ratification from all states where she crossed the 40% mark – a group including states such as Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas – they also would have to pick up five states that voted more than three-to-two against Senator Clinton. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 8:12 am
Unfortunately, their claims were initially denied so they came to me for representation.First, I was able to get them expedited Social Security Disability hearings before administrative law judges since they had claimed disability due to active military service after October 1, 2001.Second, in Virginia and in the Fourth Circuit (which covers Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and South Carolina) there had been a favorable ruling by the United… [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:24 am
United States and the 2011 case Kentucky v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
United States 16-142 Issue: Whether 21 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
S. 558 (2003) and United States v. [read post]
