Search for: "WARREN v. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 2,079
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Kay Marbiah
At the moment, the tort continues to be invoked alongside data breach claims in a “catch all” approach by claimants (as, for example, in Darren Lee Warren v DSG Retail Limited,[19] where the court held that the claimant’s attempt to claim for misuse of private information failed because there was no positive action to indicate interference by the defendant). [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am by Derek T. Muller
”As to the dissenting opinion, it’s worth framing the matter from Supreme Court precedent as Chief Justice Earl Warren did in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
The case originated from DeSantis’s decision to suspend Hillsborough County State Attorney Andrew Warren in August 2022 following the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the landmark Roe v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
31 May 2006, 6:29 am by Koz
The Justices voted 5-2 in April to accept an appeal from Warren County in which the 12th Ohio District Court of Appeals upheld the domestic violence law. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
In a 1966 decision, in a Hawaii state legislative redistricting case, Burns v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law and former LHB Guest Blogger is up on the BBC History Extra with A brief history of US abortion law, before and after Roe v Wade. [read post]