Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 6,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
The questions were also raised by this court in its recent decision in AP (Trindad and Tobago) v SSHD. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
(People v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
The Court considered R(M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) as the leading case on s.21(1). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
Executing legally sufficient contracts with providers; and v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
Human Rights Committee’s decision in Teitiota v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
Louis plans to cross the border into Illinois to obtain an abortion, which will end the life of one of its citizens. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:35 am
Chavez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
The Applicant claimed to be a Bedoon, a member of an ethnic group mostly living around the borders of Iran, Iraq, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
Discussions on the proposed Regulation continue.Cross-border liability and jurisdiction In the law enforcement field the EU has proposed a Regulation on EU Production and Preservation Orders (the ‘e-Evidence Regulation’) and associated Directive that would set up a regime for some cross-border requests direct to service providers. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
At Take Care, Leah Litman considers how the issues in Gundy v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:04 am
Florida (08-7412) and Graham v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm
Marshal v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:20 am
In 1987, Comm. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:51 am
Ballay v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:10 am
TriMed, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 11:00 am
Two days after Davis, in Borges v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
“Every employee at these three sprawling agencies would therefore be implicated by ACLJ’s request, including those that have nothing to do with the border. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]