Search for: "Matter of Joseph S." Results 3781 - 3800 of 4,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2024, 1:18 am by INFORRM
” DLA Piper’s Privacy Matters blog has summarised new guidance published by the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre on how organisations should communicate effectively in response to a cyber security incident. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
"Below please find this month's specific new content that has been added to HeinOnline.... [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:48 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/uOOnRf (Peter Coons) UK Government Launches Personal Data Sharing Initiative With Major Businesses - http://bit.ly/vwBxz6 (Pinsent Masons) MongoDB – Why Does NoSQL Matter? [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:06 pm by Tom Smith
Joseph's School in Boise, Idaho in the early 1960's. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm by Ilya Somin
These rulings have led other commentators, including myself, to become more pessimistic (see also analyses by Billy Binion and Mark Joseph Stern). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:00 am by azatty
Joseph, Springfield, and Jefferson City, Mo.; Topeka, Kan.; and Edwardsville, Ill. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:37 am by Christopher J. Walker
Greene’s Energy Group, concluded that the grant of a patent is a matter involving public rights. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by Dennis Crouch
  However, patents are routinely invalidated after common law modifications to laws, such as the scope of patentable subject matter with no claims of takings. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:09 pm by David Yamada
When might the ability to make that distinction be relevant to sorting through legal matters? [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Fifth Circuit Stays Ruling that Stanford Group’s D&O Insurers Must Pay Defense Fees: As I noted in an earlier post (here), on January 26, 2010, Southern District of Texas David Hittner had ordered Stanford Financial Group’s D&O liability insurers to pay the defense expenses that former Stanford officers (including Allen Stanford) are incurring in connection with various legal matters arising out of the Stanford scandal. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:39 am by Mike Scarcella
When Grassley suggested that Morris and Welch should have been more active in the case, taking direct responsibility for discovery and other matters, Schuelke responded: “No question. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:36 am by David Kopel
Second, the Court has jurisdiction over “matters specifically provided for ... in treaties and conventions in force. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Kevin T. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Whether the Lord Bissell lawyers should have gone public with their concerns, blowing the whistle on their client, remains a matter of debate – and that expectation probably went a bit too far. [read post]