Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 3781 - 3800 of 156,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
  In District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981), to forfeit automobiles owned by non Native Americans for violation of tribal drug laws while on tribal land? [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:52 am
Because the effect of the omission is to limit the period of incarceration to the unsuspended part of the sentence, that becomes, in law, the effective sentence. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:29 am by Lawrence Solum
CALL FOR PAPERS:  For a proposed symposium  to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:31 pm
As I note in the piece, most attorneys and law firms would have simply capitulated to the original correspondence from the state bar. [read post]
After overwhelming support in the state legislature, Connecticut is about to become the fifth state with a comprehensive privacy law, as SB 6 awaits signature by Governor Ned Lamont. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm by NARF
Bureau of Reclamation (Klamath Water Basin; Endangered Species Act; Water Rights) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Laws v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:26 am by Jason Brown
In Part 2, we’ll examine the reasoning behind this decision, and how it might impact not only divorces, but state law in general. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 7:27 am
Federal administrative agencies have always had the authority to issue substantive regulations that conflict with, and therefore ultimately preempt, state law. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm by NARF
United States, et al. (638 Contract for Law Enforcement Services; Law Enforcement Assist Agreement) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Montana Democratic Party, et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2006, 1:44 pm by Tom Lincoln
The United States Sentencing Commission has released a Report on the Impact of United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:53 am by Eric Goldman
On the First Amendment, the state argued that the law should be subject to intermediate scrutiny. [read post]