Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 76,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2014, 10:43 am
Judge Abrams wrote that this “argument is unpersuasive because it conflicts with the Second Circuit’s holding in Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
United States Supreme Court distinguishes a law from a regulation for the purposes the federal whistle blower statute Department of Homeland Security v MacLean, USSC #13-984 A federal air marshal publicly disclosed that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) had decided to cut costs by removing air marshals from certain flights. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(2) states that, “[i]n aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment creditor . . . may obtain discovery from any person—inclu [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:28 am
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] the question presented is: "Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 3:35 pm
The case presents the question whether a state statute, which permits the prosecution to submit a forensic lab report without putting the person who prepared it on the witness stand, violates the Confrontation Clause as construed by Crawford v. [read post]
10 Mar 2003, 3:05 am
[PDF], Justice Souter held for a unanimous Court that local govenrments, unlike States, are 'persons' subject to qui tam actions under the False Claims Act.... [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
She uses the State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 8:01 am
The prosecution, correctly summarizing Colorado state law, said that Counterman’s mental state was irrelevant: It was enough if a reasonable person would view his statements as threatening. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 11:53 am
My “brief” and evidence in Ron Friedmann v Shaw Industries, Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 10:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:52 am
In this case the personal injury lawyers successfully convinced State Farm who insured Mr. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
See, e.g., Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:47 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
Morgan Washington State’s Proposed Employer Social Me [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 12:35 pm
Most notably, the landmark decision AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:13 am
Via Scotusblog, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari this morning in Rothgery v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
