Search for: "State v. W. B." Results 3781 - 3800 of 4,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
" (This strikes me as a weak argument because in matters of diplomatic relations, the executive branch is the relevant authority.) b) Her intent was to influence Syria's conduct with respect to Israel, not the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Disease Burden from Viral Hepatitis A, B, and C in the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am by Jim Baker
Those efforts have caused me to rethink my prior beliefs about encryption and to better align those beliefs with the reality that (a) Congress has failed to act—and is not likely to act—to change relevant law notwithstanding law enforcement’s frequent complaints about encryption, and (b) the digital ecosystem’s high degree of vulnerability to a range of malicious cyber actors is an existential threat to society. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am by admin
A Protectionist Country Blocks Two More Big Deals, Petronas Rejection Casts Doubt on CNOOC $15.1 Billion Bid, Market braces for Petronas fallout, Mulcair Slams Feds on Handling of Petronas Deal, Petronas Deal on Hold Not Dead. ____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences … [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
Quillen, Jr., Senior Advisor, Cornerstone Research, from Robert W. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am by Fiona de Londras
Although the European Court of Human Rights this week struck a blow to the marriage equality campaign in Schalk and Kopf v Austria by holding that Article 12 of the ECHR (the right to marriage) did not oblige states to ensure marriage equality, the reasoning was based on the lack of a European consensus on the matter. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
The PRA states that “[t]he United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records. [read post]