Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 10,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Intitulé : LSJPA — 1920, 2019 QCCA 977Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Montréal, 500-08-000530-198Décision de : Juges Dominique Bélanger, Martin Vauclair et Robert M. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
Such request is only admissible under Rule 49ter.2(b) and (d) PCT if it was filed within one month from the applicable time limit under Article 22 PCT for entering the regional phase, it contains the reasons for the failure to file the international application within the priority period, and the further requisite fee for restoration is paid.3.3 As a consequence, in the present case the restoration of the right of priority decided by the USTPO, acting as RO, is not effective before… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
Such request is only admissible under Rule 49ter.2(b) and (d) PCT if it was filed within one month from the applicable time limit under Article 22 PCT for entering the regional phase, it contains the reasons for the failure to file the international application within the priority period, and the further requisite fee for restoration is paid.3.3 As a consequence, in the present case the restoration of the right of priority decided by the USTPO, acting as RO, is not effective before… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:20 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court agreed with the appellate court that sections 15(c) and 15(d) plausibly involve publication, and could fall within the one-year limitations period. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am
., is permanently enjoined from: a. enforcing or threatening to enforce in any court or in any other manner the exclusivity clause in its form contract with major league baseball players; b. entering into or seeking to enter into any contract with any major or minor league baseball player which reserves to Topps any exclusive right to sell that player’s picture in any form or in combination with any product; c. entering into, amending, or seeking to enter into or amend any… [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
Legally: Falwell v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Charron c. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
Id. at (b) & (c). [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
2009) and aff’d sub nom. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:30 pm
§1332(d)(4)(B). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Economical Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(d) Byrd v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 4:05 am
El código firmado por la gobernadora también establece que de forma transitoria y hasta que sea innecesaria, se continuará expidiendo y reconociendo la tarjeta de identificación electoral expedida por la Comisión Estatal de Elecciones (CEE), solamente a los electores que no posean otro tipo de identificación válida bajo el código. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 pm
Las deudas acumuladas actualmente se deben pagar dentro de 15 días calendarios. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:44 am
De acuerdo con los artículos 49 y 50 de la Ley General del Sistema de Medios de Impugnación en Materia Electoral (LGSMIME), el juicio de inconformidad es la vía procedente para controvertir los resultados de los cómputos distritales: a) por errores aritméticos, b) por nulidad de la votación recibida en casillas específicas y c) por nulidad de toda la elección presidencial. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm
UMG v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Below are some examples of misleading statements from WAPF in their response to outbreak papers cited in the Raw Milk Cons review: “When they tested the milk for C. jejuni, however, none could be found...Over and over again, investigators blame C. jejuni outbreaks on raw milk despite negative milk samples. [read post]
