Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 3801 - 3820 of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Taney’s hopes of settling the issue lay smashed. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
  This is reinforced by inter alia  the decision of the English and Welsh Court of Appeal, per Lord Justice Longmore, in Fiona Trust and Holding Corp & Ors v Skarga & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 275. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:48 am by Rosalind English
Transpetrol v Slovakia, Application no. 28502/08 - read judgment The facts of this case can be stated very briefly, since the main (and most interesting) question before the Curt was whether the applicant company constituted a “victim” of a human rights violation under the Convention. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
The Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm
Frito-Lay, Inc., ARB No. 10-132, ALJ No. 2010-OFC-2 (ARB May 8, 2012) Final Administrative Order PDF | HTM [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm
Frito-Lay, Inc., ARB No. 10-132, ALJ No. 2010-OFC-2 (ARB May 8, 2012) Final Administrative Order PDF | HTM [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:05 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
Second, HHJ Hacon’s view that the declaration could provide a “foundation” for inventive step arguments went against the well-established view that obviousness should not be assessed on a step-by-step basis (see for example the warning in Technograph v Mills & Rockley [1972] RPC 346). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:22 pm
A defendant who didn’t make that request clearly enough was unsuccessful in his appeal in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
One was a glass pipe, a cigarette lighter, a box of wooden matches that was open and it had two pills laying on top of them, on top of the matches that were in the box, and I don't—I said a cigarette lighter was there also. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 8:40 am by Joy Waltemath
The Third and Eighth Circuits have held that lay testimony combined with medical testimony raises a genuine issue of material fact as to incapacity, and the Fifth and Ninth Circuits have gone still further, holding that lay testimony alone is sufficient, the Seventh Circuit observed. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:01 pm by Tom
To identify its meaning, one must consult almost two decades worth of Federal Reports, searching for cases describing or enforcing the judicially-created crime of honest-services fraud, before this Court rejected them all as exceeding the judicial function in McNally v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
That's why, after laying out the maximal argument, W-L turns directly to the nature of the statutory exception. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
Speaking on a recent edition of BBC Radio 4’s “Media Show”, Professor Roy Greenslade predicted that Lord Justice Leveson will probably recommend “some kind of statutory regulation” of the press at the end of his inquiry. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:10 am by Christopher Tyner
  (1) The evidence at trial sufficiently supported a jury instruction on acting in concert; and (2) it was error to allow a lay witness’s opinion testimony where the witness was in no better position than the jury to know what a video showed State v. [read post]