Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 3801 - 3820 of 4,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Subsidizing Solar Power Nothing illustrates President Obama’s coherent plan, China’s long-term plans, and the difficulty for the United States to collaborate with China on saving the planet, more than solar cells and solar power plants. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
It is well established that commercially sold food falls under a strict products liability scheme.11 What varies from state to state, however, is which entities are strictly liable. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
It is well established that commercially sold food falls under a strict products liability scheme.11 What varies from state to state, however, is which entities are strictly liable. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm by Bill Marler
Unlike other foodborne pathogens, STEC, including E. coli O157:H7, is not considered to be an environmental contaminant in fresh-cut produce manufacturing/processing plants. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The complaint cites Justice Story's dicta in Lowell v Lewis (1817) which stated that inventions that are "injurious to the well being, good policy, or sound morals of society" are unpatentable. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:12 am by The Regulatory Review Staff
May 9, 2022 | Aborting the Right to Abortion | A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion turns the national debate over Roe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:32 pm by Bill Marler
Unlike other foodborne pathogens, STEC, including E. coli O157:H7, is not considered to be an environmental contaminant in fresh-cut produce manufacturing/processing plants. [read post]
  A story from May 4, 2020 reported that 373 workers at a Missouri pork processing plant tested positive. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:21 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Divisional Court upheld the AFRAAT’s decision in United Food and Commercial Workers International Union v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
Possessing or administering controlled dangerous substance  In general (a) Except as otherwise provided in this title, a person may not: (1) possess or administer to another a controlled dangerous substance, unless obtained directly or by prescription or order from an authorized provider acting in the course of professional practice; or (2) obtain or attempt to obtain a controlled dangerous substance, or procure or attempt to procure the administration of a controlled dangerous substance… [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
  A pretty good story, comparing, at the beginning of the story, the downfall of Scruggs with the face plant of Eliot Spitzer. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm by WIMS
[#Climate, #Air] GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)DOE Approves $737 Million Loan Guarantee For Nevada Solar Project EPA & DOT Delay New CAFE Proposed RulesNAS Releases 3rd Edition Of Reference Manual On Scientific Evidence$8.4 Million To Improve Engine & Powertrain EfficiencyWaste Isolation Pilot Plant Receives 10,000th Shipment Of TRU WasteHayden v. [read post]