Search for: "Waters v. United States"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 4,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:02 pm
Nakhla and Al Shimari v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:46 pm
United States is a complicated case. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:27 pm
United States, 944 F.2d 1489 (9th Cir. 1989), a case I litigated a few years back. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Supreme Court ruling in "Quon" highlights importance of employer technology-usage and privacy policiesPrepared by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLPOn June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided City of Ontario v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:20 am
ESA requires agencies considering actions that “may affect” listed species and their habitat to consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”). [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Then they were standing at the door to the police investigative analysis unit. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am
After all the disclosures about surveillance on foreign leaders, Ashley did some digging through the publicly available documents and treaties, and she is pretty sure there is no legally binding “no spy” agreement between the United States and other countries. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
KJH v HGF [2010] EWHC 3064. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:16 am
United States, available here. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm
United States, 959 F.2d 1558, 1561 (11th Cir. 1992). [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:18 am
And following a decision out of the Bronx by Judge Edgar Walker in People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
Canada and the United States have an obligation to respect and protect human rights. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:09 pm
The Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1, reads in full: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
