Search for: "Heard v. State"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 17,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am
The second is Robinson (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:09 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
I had, of course, heard of Kucker but had not seen a court mention it. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
I had, of course, heard of Kucker but had not seen a court mention it. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
By Lane V. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:26 pm
The case, Grants Pass v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 21 Feb 2017. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores… [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 1:04 pm
V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:24 am
On December 6, 2011, just five days after it heard oral arguments in the case, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a victory for a transgender woman, Vandiver Elizabeth Glenn, who sued her former employer, the Georgia state legislature, for violating the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:51 am
” Argued: On March 1, 2021, the court heard oral arguments in US v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:52 pm
Which, though perhaps technically irrelevant to the issue of credibility, is definitely something of which the reader takes notice: the fact that, after his expulsion, the alleged perpetrator was apparently "charged with committing several felonies near USC, and, in April 2016, sentenced to six years in state prison, a sentence he was serving when the petition was heard. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 12:15 pm
Once they do, however, the clerk is required to "promptly" let you know what happened to your petition; e.g., send you a copy of its denial.You haven't heard boo (read: anything) from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 9:03 am
Kent, Oyez.org Riegel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
The Court heard at least some historical arguments from all of the advocates. [read post]
