Search for: "House v. State"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 25,093
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Corfield v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:06 am
House. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 9:35 am
Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v TM (2021) EWCA Civ 1890 We saw in Taylor v Slough Borough Council (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch) (our note) that in possession claims where a defence of breach of public sector equality duty was raised, the courts would be prepared to accept subsequent compliance (even after the issue of proceedings) as ‘remedying’ the breach. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
And is it worth it - or even altogether possible from a legal standpoint - for, say, a fashion house to take action in an attempt to repress the production and sale of garments that look a bit too similar to the real thing? [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:27 am
And I had to walk a huge distance until I could find a house that allowed me to pimp their wireless access. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:24 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled yesterday in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, et al v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:16 pm
Cali)Petition for certiorariBrief of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in opposition (forthcoming)Brief of respondent Karen Golinski in support In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
In Jalali v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:46 am
The plaintiff in the case of McFadden v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
Nobles v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:32 pm
United States (Agricultural Leases) Johnson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm
See Stuben Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:15 am
In Pasadena Republican Club v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 10:53 am
See, Fisher v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:35 pm
–Gordon v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:56 pm
In Salas v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:37 am
But then s.167 – no re-entry or forfeiture for small amounts, expressly states “long lease” has the meaning given by sections 76 and 77 of this Act, except that a shared ownership lease is a long lease whatever the tenant’s total share, And, of course, forfeiture doesn’t apply to an assured tenancy, as it is expressly ruled out by Housing Act 1988. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
Now we have a Supreme Court decision (United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:11 pm
Today's Supreme Court docket update indicated that Foerster v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm
At the Texas Insider, State Rep. [read post]
