Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe" Results 3821 - 3840 of 19,663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
(See https://www.childsupport.ny.gov/dcse/pdfs/CSSA.pdf) Revised Forms for Use in Matrimonial Actions in Supreme Court were adopted effective March 1, 2020. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
The only facts that matter are these and they are not in dispute--plaintiffs are an unmarried same-sex couple, want to adopt children together, cannot marry because of state law, and cannot adopt children together because of state law. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:13 pm by SOIssues
" In N.E., the Court distinguished a CHINS adjudication, which does not address parental fault, from proceedings to terminate a parent's rights, which does. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 5:56 am by Alain Leibman
The SEC model does not involve the filing of a complaint, even under seal, but the submission of a claim form, and the anonymity of the informant is not assured. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:34 pm by AALRR
"   While the court declined to adopt a general test for who does and who does not qualify as a "minister" for purposes of applying the "ministerial exception," the court nevertheless did provide some guidance helpful to employers who are religious institutions. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  It does not cure the problems with majority vote provisions but it does enhance the ability of shareholders to use the power to remove directors from the board. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 11:22 am by Jon
Or perhaps it was “adopted” by some administrator with no legislative authority for it. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 7:12 am by Joshua A. Stein
This line of reasoning is similar to that adopted in judicial decisions holding that while the ADA’s overarching civil rights obligations apply to websites, it would be inappropriate to specifically require compliance with WCAG 2.0/2.1, without the WCAG having been officially adopted by the government as a required standard. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:28 pm
This does not seem consistent with a scheme of attributed competences, nor with a system in which decisions are to be taken "as closely as possible to the citizen," in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 6:31 am
”In N.E., the Court distinguished a CHINS adjudication, which does not address parental fault, from proceedings to terminate a parent’s rights, which does. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:03 am by Simon Lester
(Related  to the Treaty of Waitangi, Article 12.1, paragraph 2 says the digital chapter does not apply to: "(c) measures adopted or maintained by New Zealand that it deems necessary to protect or promote Māori rights, interests, duties and responsibilities1 in respect of matters covered by this Chapter, including in fulfilment of New Zealand's obligations under te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi, provided that such measures are not used as a… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am by Lucy Reed
The RRO judgment in Re J does not tell us the outcome of the case, and does not indicate any irregularity in the making of the EPO. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by JB
Lash does have some of this material. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “[V]irtually all states have adopted the Model Bill and its disparagement provision. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:15 am by INFORRM
Under the reportage defence, however, liability will be avoided where the republisher does not adopt or present the repeated defamatory allegation as fact, but instead simply republishes the allegation as part of a story that has the effect of reporting, in the public interest, the fact that the allegation has been made”. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 4:08 am by Neil H. Buchanan
.'  In fact, he not only dispenses with a step-by-step explanation, but he frequently does not even bother to tell us what the policy is that will make things great again. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am by MBettman
“Aren’t you really asking this court to adopt an “extreme and outrageous” proximate cause standard which would be in conflict with the immunity statutes set forth by the General Assembly? [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:17 am by David S. Cohen
  If other information does matter, such as the year the statute was adopted or revised, it's probably been discussed in the text anyway. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 5:35 am by SHG
Why does it matter whether all 12 jurors in a felony case vote to convict, or only 10 of 12? [read post]