Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 3821 - 3840 of 8,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The decision letter stated: “As you are aware Westminster is currently suffering from a severe shortage of both temporary and permanent accommodation. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm by Erin Miller
The following essay, part of our Race and the Supreme Court program, is by Gail Heriot, a member of the United States Commission on Civil Rights and a professor of law at the University of San Diego. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its ruling in Young v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Conor McEvily
Bullock, a case that might allow the Court to reconsider its decision two years ago in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm by Isabel McArdle
The third section of the article focuses on ongoing litigation in Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State and Al Rawi v Secretary of State, where the Claimants attempt to expose the role played by the British Government in their detention at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:01 am by Mark M. Campanella, Esq.
The petitioner has nonetheless stated that it is considering its other options going forward, including a possible appeal to the United States Supreme Court and the possibility of its presenting better proof of its qualifying tax exempt status to the tax tribunal for consideration. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-799; Vance v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has cut more than US$12 million from damages awarded to an intern who sued a chief executive for sexual harassment and defamation. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
In addition to the composition of the court, one other thing has changed in the two years since the justices last heard oral argument on the agency-fee question: the position of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm by Gregory Forman
United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates equal protection and is therefore unconstitutional. [read post]