Search for: "Guest v. State" Results 3841 - 3860 of 4,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 10:11 pm
Former Guest Kat Valentina Torelli has taken a close look at the new General Data Protection Regulation. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 1:21 pm by Andrew Delaney
McLaughlin is a guest at state-subsidized housing—the kind very few people willingly live in. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:25 am
The twitching was erroneous in Rocknroll v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWHC 24 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Mr Justice Briggs last week that had no shake-rattle-and-roll in it at all. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:54 pm
This kind of “misunderstanding” is not unlikely in the video game industry in relation to football players, like in the Maradona v Konami case (see here and here), a case that was eventually settled. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
  The original shot in this battle, arguing that the new patent package was setting a dangerous precedent since the EU Member States were stripping the Union of its powers, can be read here. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that  test. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 12:15 am
 Former Guest Kat, Darren Meale, of Simmons & Simmons, issues a reminder that you have until September 2016 to file to ensure your pre-22 June 2012 EUTMs cover all the goods and services you think they cover. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 11:50 pm by Neil Wilkof
Back then, Poland was not a Member State of the EU (it joined in 2004) and was therefore not bound by EU law. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
Shirts come in three sizesThe roll of the troll in shaping US patent legislation, and the dividing line between true and the faux troll, are matters that can provide endless hours of argument both in the United States and beyond. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:29 am
Tram in EdinburghThe IPKat is delighted to host the following guest post, drafted by Andrew McWhirter (Brodies Solicitors) concerning a recent Scottish trade secrets decision: Bilfinger v Edinburgh Tram Inquiry.Here’s what Andrew writes: “It is no secret (amongst local residents at least) that the publicly-funded Edinburgh tram project was seriously delayed, and cost almost double the original estimate at nearly £1 billion. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
 The United States Patent and Trademark Office has just been reportedly faced with a case of alleged nepotism on the part of one of its Commissioners, the outcome being reported by the Washington Times (here, with a katpat to Chris Torrero for the link). [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 2:23 pm
As a fan of the IPKat since law school some ten years ago, this guest Kat is honoured for the opportunity to offer up some mewsings of his own. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
No, not at all: "Patents in Telecoms" is a lean, mean conference where the organisers can confidently state: "Most key players will be there in audience if not as speakers". [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
The second session, "Trademark and Copyrights", was chaired by former guest Kat Tara Aaron. [read post]