Search for: "Thomas v. Held"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 7,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
In Sternlicht, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:00 am
The decision in NKT Cables A/S v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:14 am
Granite Rock Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
(Roberts invoked standing in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 9:40 am
This is a matter in which the lower courts are in clear conflict - see most recently the decision of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (the highest D.C. court) in Thomas v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm
Briefly: Justice Thomas spoke yesterday at a National Archives event celebrating the 225th anniversary of the Constitution. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:17 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and other courts have held, "when a mistrial is declared with the consent of the defendant or upon his motion, it is 'ordinarily assumed to remove any barrier to reprosecution, even if the defendant's motion is necessitated by prosecutorial or judicial error.'” Lee-Thomas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
Hardwick, which had held that same-sex intimacy is not a fundamental right, but Lawrence does not clearly state that it is a fundamental right; and District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:19 pm
The second, Banks v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:41 pm
Justice Thomas concurred in the judgment. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
Marrese Seyfarth Synopsis: In Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:54 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court handed down its decision in PDR Network v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
From now on the Justices’ private conferences will be held on Thursdays. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
In a 1991 case, Freytag v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:21 am
Tuesday's Supreme Court ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Reports of Criminal Trials in the Circuit, State and United States Courts, Held in Richmond, Virginia 1 v. (1851) Howison, Robert R. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am
In Kisor v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
In that case, a civil action,the court unequivocally held that `[t]he general purpose of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act] ‘was to create a cause of action against computer hackers (e.g., electronic trespassers). [read post]
