Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 10,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2019, 4:23 am
Taylor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
(d) The chief administrator shall promulgate rules and regulations pursuant to the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L. 1968, c.410 (C. 52: 14B-1 et seq.) in order to establish a program of alcohol education and highway safety, as prescribed by this act. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:17 am
This was because (a) it was drafted by external legal advisers (Freshfields); (b) it contained language which was "that of legal relations" ('in consideration of …'); (c) the reference to an English statute and a provision that the contract was governed by English law; and (d) a clear intention that the confidentiality clause in the side letter was intended to be legally binding. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:00 am
D) The case will be argued next Term, probably in October, possibly in November. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:17 am
Sexual Assault (a) A person commits an offense if the person: (1) intentionally or knowingly: (A) causes the penetration of the anus or female sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person’s consent; (B) causes the penetration of the mouth of another person by the sexual organ of the actor, without that person’s consent; or (C) causes the sexual organ of another person, without that person’s consent, to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or… [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
&C.4th 375, 2007 WL 6853118 (2007)[see also companion decision: Decker v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 8:40 am
(D) Automated reinvestigation system. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:19 am
McCormick v Carrier, (Docket No. 136738, rel’d 7/31/10). [read post]
TV and radio transmissions in spa establishments are communications to the public, says AG Sharpston
28 Nov 2013, 12:18 am
So, katpat to the one and only IPKat Jeremy for telling everything about Case C-351/12 Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, o.s. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
” But this is smoke and mirrors: they claim rights b/c it’s authentic and it’s authentic b/c they claim rights. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:40 am
46(c). [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm
(c) What is the subject of the report The complaint only concerned the covertly taken photographs. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am
Contingent issues then arose, if section 32(2) were not so compatible (c) should s.32 be read down under s.3 Human Rights Act to be compatible, either by reading it as an exemption which (i) ceased to operate at the end of the inquiry or (ii) as a qualified exemption requiring a general balancing of competing public interests) rather than an absolute exemption;and (d) if it is not possible to interpret s.32(2) in a manner that is compatible with the Convention, whether the Supreme… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm
(d) The judge was wrong to reject MGN’s submission that damages for breach of privacy are compensation for injured feelings and are not intended to mark wrongdoing, such damages being vindicatory in effect and therefore contrary to the principles stated inLumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
Stephens v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
Joseph Lepage v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Family Court Act section 756-b was added § 8. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
SPDC is de voortzetting van Shell D’Arcy, dat in 1938 in Nigeria een vergunning verkreeg om naar olie te zoeken. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
What about Rule 4(e)(2)(B)? [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:53 pm
Rule 5:1-5(b)(2)(B)(i)-(iii) codified more or less Justice Long’s opinion in Fawzy v. [read post]
