Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 93,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2015, 12:51 pm
In affirming the trial court’s decision, the state supreme court receded from the 1984 precedent set in the case of Florida Physician’s Insurance Reciprocal v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:02 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
If Congress does not prescribe a time limit, does ratification remain open forever? [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:45 am
But the right to a fair hearing does not trump all other considerations, such as the safety of the public. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:17 am
The case is Grogan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:43 am
The Fourth Circuit, on the one hand, has concluded that the 4-R Act does not permit a railroad to challenge the valuation methodology of a state. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:20 am
Park argued that the ordinary remedy for a state violation is an injunction, which Breyer said does nothing for an infringement that occurred yesterday. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
Indeed, Florida courts, as in Montgomery v State, State v Mason and Smith v State, have held that a nolo contendere plea with adjudication withheld is generally considered a conviction for purposes of determining a defendant's sentence for subsequent convictions. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm
Ice, last year, 1).does not revive former Ohio statutory requirements for judges imposing consecutive sentences in criminal cases; and 2) defendants sentenced by trial judges who didn’t apply those former provisions are not entitled to resentencing. [ State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
The ruling ultimately does not overrule Wong Sun v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:41 am
United States, 2009 U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:09 am
On June 15th, 2020, The Supreme Court of the United States made a landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
When the European Court decides that there has been no violation of the Convention, because the relevant state has acted within the “margin of appreciation” afforded to it, it does not cede the function of interpreting the Convention to the states which are parties to the Convention, nor does it give their domestic courts the function of deciding whether the issue should be determined by the legislature, executive or the courts. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 10:59 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:37 am
Cooley Law School v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:09 am
In Skilling v. [read post]
