Search for: "In re Branch"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 5,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
” See In re Epstein, 32 F.3d 1559 (Fed. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:38 pm
But I do believe there's a consensus in the Executive Branch position that the President has the authority to deploy U.S. forces into hostilities when Congress has not spoken to the question. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 3:52 am
City of Long Branch, 670 F. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Sometimes, power holders break promises because they’re self-dealing or corrupt. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 2:25 am
The feedback from team members is golden and often highlights what pivots need to be taken from time to time to show them that we’re all on the same team. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 4:12 am
They're trying to protect America's favorite corporate big dogs, and the executive branch's unfettered power to wave the wand and say magic words like "executive privilege" and "classified information," etc., in order to get out of any mess they make, regardless of the repercussions for real people. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:16 pm
They aren’t seeking solutions; they’re picking fights. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:28 am
Not so much an article as a thoughtful and well-reasoned paper, "Repairing FRAND: Recreating Open Access to Telecoms Standards" is a piece by Sharaz Gill (Associate Vice-President and Licensing EMEA, HTC Belgium's Middle East Branch). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:30 am
Why do you need dumbos like me to finance it for you, if you’re so friggin’ smart? [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 10:02 am
Other online dating services are branching out too. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
”This decision has also explicitly overruled the Court’s 2009 decision in Habeas Corpus nº 84078 (In re Vitor). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 11:12 am
We’re left to largely guess who asked for the seizures, how they secured them and why ICE chose the sites they did. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:40 pm
[Interviewer Q:] But you're saying that they vetted the people who are making the requests. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
Commentary on the Court’s decision comes from: Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, who contends that “[t]he whole sordid tale can tell us something important about how the court does its business today when interpreting statutes”; Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, who applauds the decision on the ground that “[p]rosecutorial overreach happens every day” and contends that “it is to the Court’s credit that six of its justices contented themselves with… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:08 am
However, we’re among the first to be cut in tight budget situations, and we’re all too familiar with the perils of asking for something that’s overly broad, or asking for something that you can’t show narrowly tailored value for later on. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
If they’re on a call with me, they can’t annoy someone else. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:20 pm
For two years, Americans have been telling us that they're tired of being shut out of the legislative process. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 12:11 am
It ought to be the case that the worst-managed shops close and the best-managed shops branch out and prosper. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 1:20 pm
Will we see these actions re-sued by different representative plaintiffs? [read post]
