Search for: "State v. Franks" Results 3861 - 3880 of 4,352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Innovationpartners), ICANN reforms threaten voice of IP owners: (Managing Intellectual Property), INTA 130th annual meeting – a report: (IPKat), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IAM), INTA’s online Committee Portal premiers: (Managing Intellectual Property), Hans Van Bylen tells how careful brand management and exploitation of ‘glocal’ products helped Henkel become global player: (Managing Intellectual Property), Records number of IP owners applied for… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by NL
They stated that they then immediately contacted the other side.In short, they tried to put the blame on the client and on Counsel.This didn’t get them very far. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:44 am by William McGrath
He highlighted language from Supreme Court decisions that "defendants entering into injunctive consent judgments 'often admit to no violation of the law," (U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by NL
They stated that they then immediately contacted the other side.In short, they tried to put the blame on the client and on Counsel.This didn’t get them very far. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 4:45 am by Frank Cranmer
Given that the Bill is single-purpose, Frank (as a former Clerk of Bills in the House of Commons) reckons that it’s unselectable on the grounds that it is outside the scope of the Bill. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:20 am by Florence Campbell Jones
These concerns are exacerbated due to the fact that UWO applications are made on an ex parte basis, meaning that the respondent is not able to make representations until the order has been granted, albeit the prosecution has a duty of full and frank disclosure. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 9:46 pm by David C. Scileppi
Senators commented on the proposed rules stating that Congress did not intend to remove all restrictions on general solicitation, but merely to remove the ban on general solicitation. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
At which one is tempted (or, at any rate, Frank is tempted) to point out that, in reality, about 90 per cent of those who will be affected by the ban will be female Muslim employees who want to wear the hijab. [read post]