Search for: "COOPER v. STATE" Results 3881 - 3900 of 7,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 6:17 am by Alex Wohl
Specifically, for “intentional or willful” violations, the United States is liable for “actual damages. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
Last up is Wright v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Creech (1993)), let States limit the uses juries make of mitigation (Graham v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 6:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
For them, abortion seems like the death penalty was for Justices Brennan and Marshall; they so disagree with the fundamentals that they won't cooperate with the ordinary procedures. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:08 pm by Ilene Cooper
One of the better known instances in which the Surrogate’s Court undertook this role was Stortecky v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:08 pm by Ilene Cooper
One of the better known instances in which the Surrogate’s Court undertook this role was Stortecky v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Instead, Peradotto takes on the other main stumbling block, the Court of Appeals' 2006 decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
First American Title Insurance Company 14-106Issue: Whether federal due process requires state-court judges, in reviewing jury-awarded punitive damages for constitutional excessiveness, to: (1) use de novo review to set punitive damages at the level they find appropriate, without viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, based on Cooper Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
Samizdat and an Independent Society in Central and Eastern Europe (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1989). [read post]