Search for: "Lowe v. Lowe" Results 3901 - 3920 of 13,950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2010, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
I suspect, for instance, that the ban on even very low poll taxes as to the right to vote — to the extent that the ban stems less from application of strict scrutiny in Harper v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 11:34 pm
All of the funds targeted for rental assistance must be used to benefit very low-income households. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:13 am by Michael Risch
For drugs, the probability of getting a patent drops to a low of 60% (which means a real abandonment rate of 40%). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case explores what happens if the Rule 68 offer would give the plaintiff everything he asks for and the plaintiff rejects it.The case is Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 10:00 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
The “this” in question is an interesting little twist in litigation over an attorney fee award to plaintiff’s counsel in the long running ERISA litigation, Frommert v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 12:31 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Otherwise, artistic works by, for example, persons who make sculptures out of sand at low water on a tidal beach, which are then washed away, could have no claim to copyright in, say, a pre-construction sketch or photograph of the completed work. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 6:25 am by Unknown
“The CFTC will use all available enforcement tools to aggressively pursue fraud and manipulation regardless of the technology that is utilized,” said Acting Director of Enforcement Gretchen Lowe. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The Freedom to Work Act generally prohibits non-compete contracts for low-wage employees. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 10:15 am
And, as is so often the case with restrictions on abortion, low-income and rural women suffer the most. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 6:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
We see why these cases are so hard to win.The case is Chiaramonte v. [read post]