Search for: "People v Childs"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 6,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2011, 1:12 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Abduction and the child’s “best interests” – analysis The Adoption Dilemma: the rights of parents v child’s interests Should journalists attend court?.. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
The most recent development in the fight over ICWA is Brackeen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
After an accidental release-and-then-recall yesterday, today the Supreme Court officially issued Moyle v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
Making Sense of the Electronic Medical Records with the Audit Trail Hospital Fails to Adequately Monitor Pregnant Mother – $11.5 Million Awarded for Death of Unborn Child and Organ Loss of Mother in Miller v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:47 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Louisiana (2008): The Eighth Amendment prohibits the execution for the conviction of the rape of a child. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
Now we worry about people censoring each other by being so abusive, that people are driven offline. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
To Justice Thomas, the intentions of people who in good faith wanted more racial diversity on campuses in 2013 are no different from the intentions of people who wanted all-white campuses in 1954. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Elonis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:24 am
As I noted in one of my early posts, one use of (or attempt to use) a SODDI defense in cybercrime cases occurs in child pornography cases when the defendant claims that it was a virus or a Trojan horse program – not him – that put child pornography on his computer. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
’ (People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 3:43 am
This is from United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
Supreme Court ruling in the case of Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:37 am
" Thus, for instance, U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 7:23 pm
Recall that the Due Process Clause (sometimes) entitles people to hearings only when there's a legally relevant factual dispute to be resolved. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm
The case, People v Hendrickson, stands for the evidentiary proposition that the testimony of the un-married participant in an adulterous union (the "other woman") can supply the requisite testimony to support a conviction, subject of course, to cross examination.In the here and now of 2009, Michigan's family courts have adhered to the "no-fault" provisions of the divorce statutes. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:29 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 1:20 pm
The case, People v Hendrickson, stands for the evidentiary proposition that the testimony of the un-married participant in an adulterous union can supply the requisite evidence to support a conviction.In the here and now of 2009, Michigan's family courts have adhered to the "no-fault" provisions of the divorce statutes. [read post]
