Search for: "State v. W. B." Results 3901 - 3920 of 4,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Two articles on the settlement in arbitration Readers may also note this very lengthy post in Kluwer Arbitration Blog by Gary B Born & Claudio Salas on the US Supreme Court's decision AT & T v Concepcion (2011). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Two articles on the settlement in arbitration Readers may also note this very lengthy post in Kluwer Arbitration Blog by Gary B Born & Claudio Salas on the US Supreme Court's decision AT & T v Concepcion (2011). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm by Robert Liles
  This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around the country. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]