Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 3921 - 3940 of 10,365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
In D 11/18, a 2018 European Qualifying Exam candidate successfully appealed the decision of the Examination Board to fail his Paper B script (D 11/18). [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Many factors, including inability to leave Berne b/c of other agreements, serve to lock in the existing system. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
’ North Carolina General Statutes § 14-458.1(a)(1)(d).State of North Carolina v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
§§ 1962(c) & 1962(d); Hacking. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Dec 2005, 10:34 am
No es muy aventurado afirmar que aquí la Cámara parece subvertir el sentido de un proceso penal, que es el de sancionar a personas, y no el de hacer control de gestión de la Administración pública.En lo que sigue, el fallo hará un enjundioso esfuerzo por llenar la laguna legal, hasta concluir en que "si bien existiría un vacío normativo en el caso específico de los locales… [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:34 am by Russell Knight
The post Military Divorce In Illinois appeared first on Russell D. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm by Russell Knight
“(1) The amount of the alternate payee’s benefit shall be the result of (A/B) x C x D where: “A” equals the number of months of (check only one) regular regular plus permissive other service that the member accumulated in the Retirement System from the date of marriage (enter date MM/DD/YYYY) to the date of divorce (enter date MM/DD/YYYY). [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A glorious day for Disability Advocates.The case is Disability Advocates, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:22 am by INFORRM
And to comply with EU law, any interference with free expression must meet four conditions: (a) be “provided by law”, (b) respect the “essence” of freedom of expression, (c) meet an “objective of general interest”, and (d) be proportionate. [read post]
In this regard, Dr Thaler’s position was that each of ss. 15(1)(a), (b), (c) and (d) are alternatives and that a person may draw entitlement to the grant of a patent from an inventor who is not the person identified in s.15(1)(a). [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:35 am
Básicamente expuso la sección respectiva del proyecto de Código Penal, que ahora vemos de muy difícil tratamiento parlamentario. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
“A análise do que se tem no Decreto-lei 70/66 desobedece, a meu ver, os princípios básicos do devido processo legal, uma vez que o devedor se vê tolhido nos seus bens sem que haja a possibilidade imediata de acesso ao Poder Judiciário”, disse. [read post]