Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2017, 8:21 pm
Six years later, in Walker v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 9:24 am
Notwithstanding the fact that the Federal Court did not expressly lay down any limitation on the applicability of extended passing-off based on these two aspects, it is not straight-forward whether Malaysian courts will follow the approach taken by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in its recent decisions in the “VODKAT” case (Diageo North America Inc & Anor v Intercontinental Brands (ICB) Limited and Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 920) and the “Greek… [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:04 am
For a concrete example of what I have in mind, consider Yates v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:45 am
Medeva Plc and Designers Guild Ltd v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:36 am
Collins, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 8:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
” Comment Two further cases ML and AR v RWB and SWB (2012) Fam Law 13 and Re P and L (2011) EWHC 343 1, the judgments of which post-date this appeal, attempted to lay down some guidance when dealing with cases which concern children born to two female parents and a known male parent. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
It is not for the courts to lay down a series of fixed rules where Parliament has decided not to do so. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:47 pm
Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:10 am
Gurung v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 62 (02 February 2012) - read judgment In a short but fascinating judgment which lays bare the foundation stones of judicial review, the Court of Appeal has articulated the principles to be applied when considering whether automatic deportation of a foreign criminal was “proportionate” for the purposes of Article 8 of the Convention. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:14 pm
" Delaware v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
While it prohibits, in particular, extending the scope of existing offences to acts which previously were not criminal offences, it also lays down the principle that the criminal law must not be extensively construed to an accused’s detriment, for instance by analogy. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 12:54 pm
Prohias v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:31 am
The lay of the land for data breach lawsuits has not changed much. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
Provided that defendant attorneys were not discharged for cause, in which case they would not be entitled to any fee (see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326 [1936]), their recovery would be limited to the fair and reasonable value of their services, computed on the basis of quantum meruit (see Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655, 658 [1993]; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454, 457-458 [1989]; Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz,… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978) Allen v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
