Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 6,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 9:21 am
Briggs v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 4:09 pm
The court denied defendant’s motion. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 11:35 am
(citing Hess v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 6:06 am
New Jersey State Parole Board, 2011 U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
” It involves a challenge to a Michigan law imposing a one-percent tax on all paid claims by carriers or third-party administrators to health-care providers for services rendered in Michigan for Michigan residents. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:02 am
The Sixth Circuit recently issued a routine little opinion, U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:52 am
United States, when it held that Johnson’s holding was retroactive to cases on collateral review. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:18 am
(See Prewitt v Walgreens Order). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
McRae and Webster v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Department of State, building upon the Secretary of State's emphasis on utilizing "smart power," "economic statecraft," and "whole-of-society" approaches. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 7:31 pm
Joseph, Michigan. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:13 am
In Davis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a state’s about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the state’s chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel… [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Ferris Faculty Association, in which the court unanimously upheld a Michigan law requiring fair-share fees, “where the state creates in the nonmembers a legal entitlement from the union, it may compel them to pay the cost. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), the Court found that states could take property from “innocent owners”—people who had done nothing wrong—if the government could show by a preponderance of the evidence that the property was involved in a crime. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:22 pm
This is because the United States Supreme Court determined in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 8:13 am
Army Corps of Engineers in 2001 and Rapanos v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am
Republican Party Sues Over Absentee Voting in Michigan (Michigan Republican Party, et al., v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
In Alvarez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
United States v. [read post]
