Search for: "People v Childs" Results 3941 - 3960 of 6,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2023, 6:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Brackeen, a challenge to the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm by Brian Shiffrin
byJill PapernoSecond Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderIn People v Fernandez (2011 NY Slip Op 04540 [6/2/11]) the Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court improperly deprived the defendant of his right to present testimony that the complainant had a bad reputation in the community for truth and veracity. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm by Dave
The DWP’s argument, in part, was that they are in the process of tightening up child support arrangements by absent parents, the usual DHP (ie discretionary housing payments) argument, but mainly that, even if there was discrimination, it did not reach the threshold required of “manifestly without reasonable justification”. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Marvin Schuldiner
If the same neutral acts in both roles, under Minkowitz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gehrl weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 9:02 am by Steve Hall
Frosh (D-Montgomery) -- an opponent of capital punishment -- successfully added an amendment to the bill that would change the standard juries use when imposing the death penalty.Under current law, juries must conclude by a "preponderance of the evidence" that aggravating factors (such as committing murder while committing another felony or murdering multiple people) outweigh mitigating factors (such as a defendant's history of abuse as a child). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:22 am by Beck, et al.
At age one, Conte is an only child. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 12:51 pm by Lawrence Taylor
However, the California Supreme Court provided eight requirements that law enforcement officers must follow when utilizing a sobriety checkpoint in the 1987 case of Ingersoll v. [read post]
Moreover challenges could be made whether or not the people fall under the definitions of “family” required to proceed in family court. [read post]