Search for: "Harris v. State"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 5,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2010, 9:50 am
That a then Yale professor and later Federal judge (Ralph Winter) was the brains behind the original challenge to campaign finance laws, in Buckley v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
See Zamsky v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Butsee Barnes v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:32 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:46 am
Yesterday, the Connecticut Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in State v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
There are two other big problems with it.First, the SG invoked cases, such as Harris v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 873-74 (1989); see also Fed. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:14 am
In that case, Buell v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
For the most part these trade disputes have been with the United States before NAFTA and Canada-U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Interestingly, the court completely ignored the U.S. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:48 pm
In Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm
" United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 1:15 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] Harris Brumfield, Trustee for Ascent Trust v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:01 am
At The Daily Signal, Elizabeth Slattery observes that after last Thursday’s order in in June Medical Services v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
Moore v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 6:39 am
The note is appended to Wickard v. [read post]
