Search for: "Million v. Million" Results 3961 - 3980 of 34,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2024, 10:09 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch DISH Network is seeking en banc review of a Federal Circuit panel decision that vacated a $3.9 million attorney fee award to the victorious defendant in Realtime Adaptive Streaming L.L.C. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
”Pullman seeks to recover damages for the violation of its rights, no less than 12.5% of the value of the Primary Wave Transaction, liquidated damages of $250,000—for a whopping total of some $125 million.Bet that wasn't music to their ears.# # #SOURCE:The Pullman Group LLC v Bauknight et al. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The mayor however says the mosque could increase traffic and interfere with nearby businesses,Meanwhile, the town of Bridgewater, New Jersey has reached a settlement with a Muslim group in Al Falah Center v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:48 pm
[Hat Tip: Co-Blogger Bob V]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
Judges used to the fear of that fist can get pretty angry when their orders are brushed aside as the insurance company found out in Station Maintenance v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in The Ministry of Defense and Support v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:27 am
"The Fifth Circuit ruling in Thompson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:36 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Actuary and blogger John Lowell has a strong post today on the latest high profile excessive fee case filed involving a 401(k) plan, Bell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 4:02 pm by Gene Quinn
That saw a $909 million verdict in 1990, and ultimately settled for $925 million about a year later, but required total aggregate attorneys fees in the neighborhood of $550 million. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:27 am
  Here is a snippet:What's really at stake is whether General Motors and the AFL-CIO will get to spend millions from their treasuries on TV and radio ads likely to influence the outcome of federal elections, and ultimately whether they and wealthy individuals funding these ads who want to shield their identities from public scrutiny will get a constitutional right to do so.Rick's always insightful (and almost always right!) [read post]