Search for: "cf"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 5,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
The Volokh Conspiracy has a post titled --The case for patent law and criminal law exceptionalism in the administrative state -- which includes the text:Why don’t courts apply the usual doctrines of administrative law in these areas? [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am
Thus the process concerns the production of oxygen for the purpose of fuelling a power generation system of the integrated gasifier combined cycle type, commonly referred to by its acronym IGCC.The impugned decision concluded that the process defined in claim 1 lacked novelty on the consideration that claim 1 is merely related to a "process for producing oxygen" that is restricted to the production of oxygen in a cryogenic air separation system, while the stated use "for fuelling an… [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:02 am
Last week, in "3D printing and the law: three recent studies and some recommendations", here, this weblog posted news from Dinusha Mendis of three recently-published reports on the intellectual property implications of 3D printing. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:09 am
PROPERTY – HOMEOWNERS POLICY – DEFECTIVE WORKMANSHIP EXCLUSION – ENSUING LOSS EXCEPTION – BURDENS OF PROOFEwald v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:08 am
And w/TM, we use the concept of source identifier to do the heavy lifting—with respect to product design, the idea of “limping marks” might also be of use, cf. the European Kit Kat case: association isn’t enough. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 11:39 pm
Instead of the development of individualities which it prophetically set forth, there is a perversion of the whole ideal of individualism to conform to the practices of a pecuniary culture [cf. conservative claptrap about capitalism as a unique and unassailable fount of our ‘liberty’]. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:54 am
(Cf. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 1:52 pm
My suggestion: Partnerships for Democratic Shared Prosperity (cf. here). [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm
New York Probate Lawyers said this is the first New York decision to consider the effect of the recent AT & T divestiture on a bequest of AT & T stock. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:14 pm
It is neither an incidental nor an accidental fact that “the dramatic rise in the ratio of profits to wages provides a material foundation for the sharp rise in the overall income inequality” (Anwar Shaikh), for in the absence of a strong and broad coalition of Leftist forces, capital has its way with labor, and the ill-effects reverberate throughout the social order (cf. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am
Put simply, Plaintiff cannot copyright the idea of levitation, a trope often used to suggest a magical or fantastic realm, cf. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 1:20 pm
Cf. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm
’”) (internal citations omitted). [9] Carhart, 550 U.S. at 154-56. [10] Id.at 158; cf. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
This post examines an opinion recently issued by the U.S.Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit: U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 2:02 pm
CIPPIC remains on the record, pro bono, for CAUT and CFS, along with Prof. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Ct. 2584 (2015). [4] Cf. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
Reviewing a determination of the Board of Trustees of the New York City Employees' Retirement System [NYCERS] denying the Petitioner's application for World Trade Center disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §605(h), Supreme Court annulled NYCERS' determination and directed NYCERS to provide the Petitioner with World Trade Center disability retirement benefits retroactive to October 11, 2018. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:54 pm
Cf. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:33 pm
For whether or not OBOR and AIIB will displace or supplement the current variation of globalization and its financial apparatus through IFIs like the World Bank, both will play significant roles in shaping their future (cf. here). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board found itself unable to endorse the opinion that the fees were a financial compensation to the EPO in respect of extra work (in the substantial examination) caused by the number of claims (cf. [read post]
