Search for: "Addington v. United States"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
January 9, 2009 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM OF THE JUSTICE ROBERT H. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
United States, in light of Caniglia. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, dissenting in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
United States, 541 U. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 1:36 pm
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
"Now, imagine you are the CEO or General Counsel of a telcom company that has been assisting the NSA in electronic surveillance for two years, assured that what appear to be your violations of FISA do not subject you to legal exposure because you have been relying on the certification "by the Attorney General of the United States that no warrant or court order is required by law. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:50 pm
That is one way that the Constitution-in-practice (as opposed to your or my particular vision of the ideal Constitution) tends to stay in sync with the center of political power in the United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:33 am
In support of this contention, Jason relies on the recent United States Supreme Court decisions recognizing an individual’s right to bear arms under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
This principle was established by the United States in one of the most dramatic of the post-World War II proceedings, United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Similarly, in Nixon v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Secret Advantages of Judge Taylor's Opinion in ACLU v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
" The plan states that such Fed actions "should be coordinated and implemented with the appropriate regulatory agency to the fullest extent possible. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
" Marbury v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
United Grain Growers Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701 for essentially the same conduct that attracted the punitive damage award. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
What follows is a compendium of substantive analyses on some of the key issues of the War on Terror by the authors here at Balkinization.The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Civil Liberties, the War on Terror and Presidential PowerPart I-- Civil LibertiesPart II-- Presidential Power and Constitutional StructurePart III-- Torture and the "Torture Memos"Part IV- The NSA Controversy and Government SurveillancePart V-- HamdanPart VI-- The Military Commissions Act of… [read post]
