Search for: "Agency of Natural Resources v. Persons" Results 21 - 40 of 986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
”  According to Macko, cases will be considered based on overall circumstances, including harm to consumers, nature and severity to the harm, good nature to comply, and the size and resources of a business. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:51 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Eighth, the bill would also amend Section 21167 of the Public Resources Code to add and cap a tolling of the time period in which a person is required to bring a challenge to an agency’s CEQA action to four years, although, extensions to any tolling agreement would also be authorized. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Agency had determined its action was not a “project” subject to CEQA or, alternatively, was exempt under CEQA’s Class 7 and 8 categorical exemptions (i.e., regulatory agency actions to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of natural resources and the environment) and the “common sense” exemption. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 9:14 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The claim, which had been made against the state Department of Natural Resources, alleged that the state agency was liable for damages by allowing a submerged dredge pipe to be kept in the lake, creating an unreasonably dangerous condition that resulted in the deadly accident. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and its progeny. [read post]