Search for: "Al Bahlul v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2014, 6:33 am
Circuit Wednesday in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:41 am
Ben beat me to it, but this morning, the D.C Circuit issued a terse order removing United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:56 pm
In United States v. al-Bahlul, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) continues the dangerous flirtation with the Nuremberg membership cases that it began with its Hamdan decision in June. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
United States may hint at a reprise of the al-Kidd pattern. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Circuit oral argument in al Bahlul v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
” Since 1776, the United States has authorized the use of military tribunals for trying espionage and aiding the enemy, neither of which are offenses against international law. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:54 am
It thus appears that a majority of the court’s seven active judges wish to explore the rulings of two three-judge panels, one in Al-Bahlul and another in a closely related case, United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) upheld Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman al Bahlul’s conviction and life sentence for conspiracy to commit war crimes. [read post]
2 May 2013, 5:04 pm
As Raff noted last week, the lawyers for the defendant-appellant in United States v. al-Bahlul–the military commission case in which the D.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:18 pm
United States, 696 F.3d 1238 (D.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
United States, the Court held that courts-martial of members of the military did not require that an offense be “service-connected. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:40 pm
Reported on Friday by the Miami Herald’s Carol Rosenberg: defense attorneys in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Cases like United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:11 am
Third, Steve asserts that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces’ decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:03 pm
United States, 696 F.3d 1238 (D.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:51 pm
The best indication of the joint dissent’s misunderstanding of the Framers’ scheme is its treatment of Justice Story’s landmark 1820 opinion in a piracy case, United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm
But the key to al Bahlul is accepting that these are the stakes–and that Quirin simply did not–and does not–settle the matter. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:12 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:33 am
Appellant's filed their Response to the Specified Issues and an accompanying motion at the Court of Military Commission Review in United States v. [read post]
