Search for: "Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” At Cities Speak, Lisa Soronen discusses last week’s cert. grant in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:07 am
And so did the city-county of San Francisco in its own brief in opposition, also filed Friday night. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
City and County of San Francisco, California: The case revolves around a legal challenge to a federal immigration rule. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm
City and County of San Francisco but eventually DIGed the case this spring, after briefing and argument raised a host of complicated issues that prevented the court from addressing the timing of the states’ intervention. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
Some commentators, such as Debra Saunders at the San Francisco Chronicle, have echoed the concerns expressed by Justices Alito and Scalia in their dissents – that the decision will lead to the mass release of prisoners and an increase in crime. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
In some cities (like San Francisco), the moniker signifies that local police officers are prevented not only from using city resources to comply with a detainer request from federal immigration officers (ICE), but also, critically, from gathering certain kinds of information or complying with ICE's requests for advance notification of when an individual (who is not a suspected violent felon) in city custody is being released. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm
City and County of San Francisco, the justices agreed to decide whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-Main 2.00 $96,321 $48,200 Univ. of Missouri-Kansas City 2.02 $99,005 $49,000 Indiana Univ. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704 Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia’s invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY New York, Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, Ventura, Lancaster, Palmdale, Santa Barbara, Chicago, Washington D. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Then there’s three-time relist County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Both Connerly and ACRI were permitted by the district court to intervene in the present case and were represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, a conservative/libertarian public interest litigation firm that has successfully represented proponents of Section 31 in other cases, including Coral Constr, Inc v City & County of San Francisco (CalSCt (2010); 93 EPD ¶43,961) and Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc v City of San Jose… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323, 350-52 (2005)? [read post]
