Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins" Results 21 - 40 of 667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2014, 9:51 am by Steve Hall
The American Constitution Society posts ,"Hall v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:04 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Ellis (University of New Mexico - School of Law) has posted Hall v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:18 am by Steve Hall
Eric Pinkard, an attorney representing Freddie Hass has issued this statement: “Today’s decision ensures that Florida cannot evade the Supreme Court’s landmark 2002 Atkins v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:49 am by Jon Sands
[Ed. note: The Arizona FPD represented the codefendant in this case.]Smith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
Blume asserted that Ashe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:43 pm
It's unconstitutional to execute people with mental retardation, the Court said in Atkins v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:41 am
. - Five years after the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:27 am by Dominic Yobbi
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday over how to apply the court's 2002 decision Atkins v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:01 pm
Michael Atkins (a/k/a the Seattle Trademark Lawyer) has graciously offered to host "Meet the Bloggers V" at this year's INTA Annual Meeting in Seattle.Date: Monday, May 18 Time: 6-9 p.m. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:50 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Florida: Whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:35 am
Michael Atkins provides a detailed report here at his Seattle Trademark Lawyer blog, on the oral argument held Friday, February 23rd in the Hormel Foods Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 6:22 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The basis for each of these prohibitions is the 8th Amendment's ban of cruel and unusual punishment.Mental disability made the list via the 2002 decision in Atkins v Virginia. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:51 am by Steve Hall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruling in Pizzuto v. [read post]