Search for: "Bass v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm
Inter partes review is a provision of the American Invents Act (AIA) to challenge the validity of a patent before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in the United States Patent and Trademark Office.link: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ptab-invalidates-lucerne-biosciences-813-patent-for-the-treatment-of-binge-eating-disorder-with-lisdexamfetamine-dimesylate-300098752.htmlNote also: … [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:13 am
” United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:08 am
Ackman, Marsha Bass, W. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:38 am
Without lawful status youth are under constant threat of detention and deportation, resulting in separation from their families and communities in the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:06 am
Ford Motor Company, November 29, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the the Sixth Circuit More Blog Entries: J&J Fires Back on Pelvic Mesh Marketing Lawsuit, July 15, 2016, Boston Product Liability Attorney Blog The post Jackson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Defendant cites to the case of Bass v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 11:39 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Most of the talk about SCOTUS last week centered on the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 4:59 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:05 am
In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
The publisher's page says:In this pathbreaking and deeply original book, John Fabian Witt tells the hidden story of the laws of war in the first century of the United States–and of the extraordinary code that emerged from it to change the course of world history. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
Mahoney attended what she describes as a “Rally” to protest the results of the 2020 United States presidential election. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:14 am
However, the policy underlying the rule established in Carmel v Lunney, supra, does not require dismissal of the entirety of plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim, because the remainder of his claim that defendants failed to advise him of the potential immigration consequences of traveling outside the United States as a result of entering a guilty plea does not dispute the validity of his conviction (see generally Carmel v Lunney, supra; see also… [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 11:24 am
We hold that it does not. 07a0331p.06 2007/08/21 Bass v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 3:55 am
See Bass Pro Trademarks LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:42 pm
United States, 278F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir. 2002); Schubert v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:53 am
[See SDL Hair Ltd v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:25 am
However, the policy underlying the rule established in Carmel v Lunney, does not require dismissal of the entirety of plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim, because the remainder of his claim that defendants failed to advise him of the potential immigration consequences of traveling outside the United States as a result of entering a guilty plea does not dispute the validity of his conviction (see generally Carmel v Lunney; see also Bass… [read post]