Search for: "Bhaven Sampat"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2019, 7:07 pm
Bhaven N. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:45 pm
They note that real-world prizes are different from those modeled in the economic literature, and they begin to remedy this empirical gap through a case study of the Progressive Insurance Automotive X Prize.Second, Jonathan Masur provides some thoughtful comments on both Burstein & Murray's prizes paper and a paper on NIH grant funding by Bhaven Sampat. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:56 pm
Hemphill and Sampat offer two interesting results: First, by doing new empirical analysis on a dataset of settlements with evidence of payment, they found that 89% of the patents at issue in such settlements were secondary patents. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 10:11 am
This approach was pioneered by Bhaven Sampat and Heidi Williams in How Do Patents Affect Follow-on Innovation? [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:23 pm
Nelson, Bhaven N. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:44 am
For example, while her work on contractual restrictions on human genes led to persistent decreases in follow-on research and commercial product development, her preliminary results from a follow-on project with Bhaven Sampat suggest that "on average gene patents have had no effect on follow-on innovation. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:37 am
Lemley, and Bhaven Sampat. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:09 pm
Note that the prolific work containing that error ("Patenting Nanotechnology") thanked Chris Cotropia, Bhaven Sampat, and Michael Martin. [read post]
Evidence from micro-level patent application data or gobbledygook from the depths of legal academia?
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
LBE got a chuckle from text at the writtendescription blog:Prior work by Mark Lemley and Bhaven Sampat has shown that more experienced examiners grant more patents, and they have some results suggesting that this is not just due to selective retention. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:54 am
The list of attendees included Mark Lemley, Amy Kapczynski, Yochai Benkler, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, John Golden, Hannah Wiseman, Rebecca Eisenberg, Michael Abramowicz, Sean Pager, Jessica Silbey, Pam Samuelson, Barton Beebe, Ian Ayres, Brett Frischmann, Mark McKenna, Bryan Choi, Frank Pasquale, Tal Zarsky, Julie Cohen, Margot Kaminski, Michael Burstein, Bhaven Sampat, Brian Wright, Jonathan Masur, Dan Burk, Liza Vertinsky, Roger Ford, Sean O’Connor, Jim Bessen, Talha Syed,… [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Adler (Duke), "Patents, Patients, and Profits: Winners and Losers in Drug Patent Challenges" by Bhaven Sampat (Columbia), and more. [read post]
29 Oct 2006, 7:03 am
We know, for instance, from Columbia Professor Bhaven Sampat that about 90% of cited non-patent prior-art references are provided by the applicant, and that only 10% are examiner references. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:51 am
Prior work by Mark Lemley and Bhaven Sampat has shown that more experienced examiners grant more patents, and they have some results suggesting that this is not just due to selective retention. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 5:45 am
Lemley & Bhaven Sampat, Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp? [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 2:20 am
For the paper, he and co-author Bhaven Sampat of Columbia followed every patent application filed in January 2001 and published by April 2006 â€" a total of 9,960 applications. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 10:23 am
Lemley & Bhaven N. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 10:52 am
Patent policy, innovation and diffusion in developing countries by Prof Bhaven Sampat, University of Columbia 4. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:10 am
Lemley & Bhaven N. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
Scott Hemphill (Columbia Law) & Bhaven N. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:01 pm
Surely, then, the examiners must be making copious use of the prior art that has been submitted by applicants.The answer is—maybe not, at least based on a study reported in the respected journal, Research Policy, Christopher Cotropia, Mark Lemley and Bhaven Sampat, “Do applicant patent citations matter? [read post]
