Search for: "Brownstein Law Group"
Results 21 - 40
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2009, 5:53 pm
Brownstein, Boochever and Bird Chair for the Study and Teaching of Freedom and Equality at the University of California, Davis, School of Law; Prof. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Above the Law reached out to managing partner Bruce James about these concerns. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:31 pm
BHARARA serves as a Co-Chair of the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:48 pm
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Patton Boggs and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld are the only other law firms to make First Street’s list of organizations with the most lobbyists who donated to Romney in 2011. [read post]
24 May 2009, 4:24 am
Brownstein, Steven A. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:06 am
The panel sponsored by the Criminal Law Practice Group is The Pros and Cons of Plea Bargaining, 3:30 to 5:00 Eastern Time Thursday. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Most of what a state legislature does involves the formulation and enactment of laws of significant breadth and scope that impact large groups and constituencies. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Why would the granting of an occasional secular exemption undermine the conclusion that the general law at issue substantially burdens the majority, and accordingly is more deserving of trust than a law which allows the majority to escape the consequences of a law’s enactment? [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
When a facially neutral law that draws no problematic classifications between groups can be shown to have a disparate impact against certain classes, and when there is strong enough evidence that a desire to harm those groups was a driving factor behind the law’s enactment, courts have been willing to strike those laws down. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
Since people of one race or gender or religion are not, by virtue of their membership in that group, inherently more (or less) capable than people of other racial, gender, or religious groups, membership in any such group should play no role in who gets hired or admitted. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
Russell Slifer: How To Improve IPRs Without Tossing The Baby Out With The Bath Water Kim Treanor: Hiring Freeze At USPTO Concerns Industry Groups Andrew Williams: Shire Has Rare Motion To Amend Granted Audrey Millemann: More Patents Invalidated As Abstract Ideas Wayne Sobon: The Surprising Rise Of China As IP Powerhouse Mikey Campbell: Qualcomm Slaps Apple With Countersuit Over Patent Royalties Too Simplistic: How the USPTO Measures Outcomes For Ex Parte PTAB Appeals Upcoming Events Los… [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
The Smith decision drew fire both from legal scholars and advocacy groups. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Perhaps the Constitution’s primary and most effective role in these events is protecting the rights of individuals and groups to protest what they see as unsanctioned violations of the equal protection of the laws. #3. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The Court’s focus was no longer on whether a law disadvantaged racial minorities or women, but rather on whether the challenged law employed a racial or gender classification. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
It is common knowledge that the vast majority of people today who want to assemble and demonstrate near funerals are members of an identifiable religious group with a distinctive, somewhat bizarre, and extremely unpopular message and point of view. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Instead, audience members are a diverse group of citizens attending the board meeting on government business to address their representatives. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
If we apply these criteria to religious people as a group, it would be hard to justify heightened scrutiny under equal protection doctrine. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:55 am
Brownstein, Adam O. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
As we wrote last fall, the lawsuit held the potential to decide whether Colorado’s public accommodations law—which prohibits covered persons from withholding goods, services, or facilities from an individual or group based on, among other things, sexual orientation—violates the First Amendment’s ban on compelled speech when the statute is applied against someone who refuses to create custom wedding cakes for same-sex wedding celebrations because doing so… [read post]
