Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2018, 2:30 pm
The Court of Appeal found, among other things, that the trial court acted improperly by aggressively questioning a witness and then arranging to have the witness invoke the Fifth Amendment in front of the jury, before any cross-examination by the defense.Horvitz & Levy represented AIG on appeal. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 11:39 am
The California Court of Appeal recently disposed of a novel attack on bad faith law launched by Zurich American Insurance Company. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:13 am
Plaintiff appealed, and the California Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 2:06 pm
State of California (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 521, 550; see Kruger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:35 pm
Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 2:47 pm
In Paregien v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 4:10 am
Yesterday's decision, Paulson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
Soledad Christian cross that stands on a hilltop north of San Diego, choosing to let the long-challenged monument’s future be examined first by a federal appeals court. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:10 am
Soledad Memorial Association v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:40 am
App. 4th ___, 2010 WL 728571, the Fifth District Court of Appeal, citing a long line of cases going back to Greyhound Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:47 am
However, a recent California Court of Appeal decision, Great American Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 4:19 pm
(UPS) appeal or cross-appeal from a jury verdict awarding Marlo unpaid overtime, meal, and rest-period wages. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court granted review last year, and the Court's web site states the issues on appeal as follows: Does Serrano v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 4:54 pm
The federal district court had found that the display of the cross violated provisions in California's constitution on separation of church and state. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:25 pm
The California Supreme Court then reversed the judgment, saying that the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the judgment against Caputo barred DKN from obtaining judgments against Farber and Neel. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
District Court for the Southern District of California in the case of Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
In Castro v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 6:21 am
Faced with this issue, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has turned to the California Supreme Court for guidance, as it has done on several other wage hour issues in recent years. [read post]
California Supreme Court bars expert testimony on the scientific unreliability of breathalyzer tests
29 Nov 2013, 2:07 am
While the trial was conducted, the California Supreme Court decided on the case of People v. [read post]
