Search for: "California Company v. Price" Results 21 - 40 of 1,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by James W. Ward
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:55 am by randal shaheen
In its complaint, the OAG accused Bioelements of engaging in what it described as a “blatant price fixing scheme” when it entered into dozens of contracts called “Internet Only Accounts Agreements” with third party companies that required them to sell Bioelements’ products online for at least as much as the suggested retail price set by Bioelements in violation of California’s Cartwright Act (California’s general… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:00 am by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
Probably the most famous case about this issue is Nebbia v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 5:33 pm by Scott Koller
  As a result, consumers often rely on their insurance company to help them navigate the multitude of different policy types, structures, pricing and provisions. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm by Michael Weil
Several gig economy companies including Lyft and Uber are promoting a ballot initiative, the Protect App-Based Drivers and Services Act, for California voters to consider in November 2020. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:15 pm
(November 2, 2009), the California Supreme Court examined a voluntary employee incentive compensation plan that provided employees with shares of restricted company stock at a reduced price in lieu of a portion of the employee's annual cash compensation. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Further details regarding The People of the State of California v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 9:40 am by Cannabis Law Group
The California Cartwright Act builds upon these principles, with specific prohibitions on things like market division schemes, exclusive dealings, price fixing, price discrimination, and group boycotting. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:17 pm by Bona Law PC
For example, under California’s antitrust statute—the Cartwright Act—it appears that resale-price-maintenance agreements may still be per se unlawful (although the California Supreme Court has not definitively addressed it since Leegin). [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:23 am by Thomas Baer
The outcome of the case may issue a setback to Apple and other tech companies who run online marketplaces.A lawsuit filed in a US District Court in California (Case No.:11–cv–06714–YGR) alleged that Apple has monopolized the iPhone app marketplace with their App Store by requiring users to purchase apps through the store at an inflated price, created by Apple’s commission structure.Apple’s defense was that independent developers… [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:09 pm by Jarod Bona
Here’s the situation in California: In 1978, the California Supreme Court issued a decision called Mailand v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 11:50 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  In doing so, the Court of Appeal departed from guidance in (and other authority embracing) the California Supreme Court’s opinion in Koire v. [read post]