Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
See Bay Guardian Company v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:47 pm
In Sanchez v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
Probably the most famous case about this issue is Nebbia v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
In People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 5:33 pm
As a result, consumers often rely on their insurance company to help them navigate the multitude of different policy types, structures, pricing and provisions. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm
Several gig economy companies including Lyft and Uber are promoting a ballot initiative, the Protect App-Based Drivers and Services Act, for California voters to consider in November 2020. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Further details regarding The People of the State of California v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 9:40 am
The California Cartwright Act builds upon these principles, with specific prohibitions on things like market division schemes, exclusive dealings, price fixing, price discrimination, and group boycotting. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:17 pm
For example, under California’s antitrust statute—the Cartwright Act—it appears that resale-price-maintenance agreements may still be per se unlawful (although the California Supreme Court has not definitively addressed it since Leegin). [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:23 am
The outcome of the case may issue a setback to Apple and other tech companies who run online marketplaces.A lawsuit filed in a US District Court in California (Case No.:11–cv–06714–YGR) alleged that Apple has monopolized the iPhone app marketplace with their App Store by requiring users to purchase apps through the store at an inflated price, created by Apple’s commission structure.Apple’s defense was that independent developers… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
Here is the abstract: TR v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:09 pm
Here’s the situation in California: In 1978, the California Supreme Court issued a decision called Mailand v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 11:50 am
In doing so, the Court of Appeal departed from guidance in (and other authority embracing) the California Supreme Court’s opinion in Koire v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:03 pm
See Morales v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:57 am
The incentive compensation plan in Schachter provided employees with shares of restricted company stock at a reduced price in lieu of a portion of their annual salaries. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 10:17 am
Regardless, insurance companies routinely engage in price discrimination and consider age and gender when setting their prices. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:25 am
In 2019, the California legislature enacted AB 5 to codify the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex West Operations, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The Facts in Pfizer In Pfizer, retail pharmacy plaintiffs alleged that pharmaceutical companies fixed pharmaceuticals prices, and asserted claims under California’s antitrust statute - the Cartwright Act (Bus. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:59 pm
Despite the California Supreme Court's conclusion that gasoline purchasers failed even to imply a price-fixing conspiracy among major oil companies, the Ninth Circuit U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 6:25 am
Sun Distributing Company v. [read post]
