Search for: "Castillo v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2016, 2:01 pm
Because the District Court granted the petition as to A.D., it instructed the District Court to order that A.D. be returned to the United States forthwith. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 6:11 am
Castaneda-Castillo has been in the United States since 1991, and has been pursuing an asylum petition since 1993. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:19 pm
” Judge Castillo’s immediate predecessor as Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, James F. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am
Fifield v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:52 pm
The first two paragraphs of the majority's per curiam opinion sets up the issue effectively:Appellant Victor Gonzalo Vega-Castillo appeals his 70-month sentence following a plea of guilty to reentering the United States illegally after having been deported or removed, in violation of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 10:41 am
Here is how the opinion starts: In this sentencing appeal, appellant, Ynocencio González-Castillo ("González") -- a Dominican national who pled guilty to unlawfully entering the United States after being previously deported -- challenges the sentence imposed on him by the district court. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:44 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am
Fifield v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
This month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Fifield’s bright line test in the case of Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
Fifield v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
” Castillo, 804 F.3d at 367 (quoting United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Three published criminal opinions yesterday -- 1) United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am
United States,” said Colon. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:53 am
The Court was also “troubled” that defendants were offering to sell contact lenses into the United States using Mon Ros’ AZURE and AMARILLO marks. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:43 pm
Montel Aetnastak, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
Below, Alexandra Lampert of Stanford Law School recaps Monday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]