Search for: "Cavanagh v. Kelly" Results 21 - 40 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 5:56 am by John Bursch
  Chief Justice Kelly authored the majority opinion, in which Justices Cavanagh, Markman, and Hathaway joined. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Julie Lam
Justice Cavanagh, joined by Justice Marilyn Kelly, issued a dissenting opinion criticizing the majority’s decision for effectively overruling the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:12 pm by Matthew Nelson
  Thus, Justices Corrigan, Weaver, and Young would have granted leave, but Justice Markman voted with Chief Justice Kelly and Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway to deny leave. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 She explained that she does not agreed with the standardized test for stare decisis in Chief Justice Kelly’s opinion in Peterson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:26 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court published  an opinion in Petersen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm by Julie Lam
  Justice Cavanagh would grant leave to appeal to consider the issue of prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Gaëtan Gerville-Réache
  Chief Justice Kelly, joined by Justice Cavanagh, dissented. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:03 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
  The majority, Justices Marilyn Kelly, Cavanagh, Markman and Hathaway, remanded the case to the trial court for application of the four-part test set forth in People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:57 am by Sarah Riley Howard
Justices Cavanagh disagreed, with Justice Kelly joining, and restated his position that the Court had correctly interpreted the Legislature’s meaning of the term. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:29 am by Matthew Nelson
  Chief Justice Kelly and Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway dissented. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:26 pm by Julie Lam
 Justices Cavanagh, Marilyn Kelly, and Hathaway would grant leave to appeal in Bondie v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm by Julie Lam
Justice Cavanagh would grant leave to appeal. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:53 am by John Bursch
”  Justice Markman authored the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Kelly and Justices Cavanagh, Corrigan, and Young. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
  Chief Justice Kelly and Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway remained silent. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:44 am by Julie Lam
In addition, a majority of the justices (Cavanagh, Kelly, Hathaway, and Weaver) determined that 11-carboxy-THC is not a schedule 1 controlled substance under MCL § 333.7212 of the Public Health Code and overruled People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 4:34 pm by Julie Lam
 Justice Cavanagh joined Justice Marilyn Kelly’s dissenting opinion. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
  Chief Justice Kelly, joined by Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway, authored a dissenting opinion, arguing that the doctrine of chances did not apply here, and even if it did, the evidence was inadmissible under MRE 403. [read post]