Search for: "Cooper v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 21 - 40
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2016, 7:11 pm
(Guest Post by Saurabh Bhattacharjee, Assistant Professor of Law at NUJS, Kolkata)The constitution of a seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court to examine whether the decision of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) v A.S. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Although Employee seeking performance of duty disability retirement benefits testified that he was being cooperative during the examination but that pain restricted his range of motion, the Comptroller credited the testimony of the orthopedic surgeon who examined Employee on behalf of the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System, and the medical report and concluded that Employee had "deliberately frustrated the Retirement System's… [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Although Employee seeking performance of duty disability retirement benefits testified that he was being cooperative during the examination but that pain restricted his range of motion, the Comptroller credited the testimony of the orthopedic surgeon who examined Employee on behalf of the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System, and the medical report and concluded that Employee had "deliberately frustrated the Retirement System's… [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Although Employee seeking performance of duty disability retirement benefits testified that he was being cooperative during the examination but that pain restricted his range of motion, the Comptroller credited the testimony of the orthopedic surgeon who examined Employee on behalf of the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System, and the medical report and concluded that Employee had "deliberately frustrated the Retirement System's… [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Although Employee seeking performance of duty disability retirement benefits testified that he was being cooperative during the examination but that pain restricted his range of motion, the Comptroller credited the testimony of the orthopedic surgeon who examined Employee on behalf of the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System, and the medical report and concluded that Employee had "deliberately frustrated the Retirement System's… [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
” She examines a study published by the California Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau (WCIRB) supplementing its earlier assessments as to medical treatments and costs of COVID-19 claims. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:20 am
The FTC has also enjoyed considerable success in narrowly confining the state action immunity doctrine, including its most recent Supreme Court victories in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
The headliner of that Conference is National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
In Messerschmidt v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
Whether there was substantial evidence to support the Board’s final decision. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
Additionally, we note that the State only wanted to examine eight of the plaintiffs. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
| Have you used the IP5 Collaborative Search and Examination (CS&E) pilot? [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
It can be difficult to hold governmental bodies accountable based on regulatory authority using the modified Anns/Cooper test in conjunction with Edwards v. the Law Society of Upper Canada.. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
(TTABlog) Petition to cancel backfires when TTAB finds SNAP merely descriptive of syringes: Inviro Medical Devices Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
[iii] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Board, the [individual] had no office at the hearing [see 600 West 115th St. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:04 am
Topics will include, amongst others: the implications of non-obviousness for follow-on medical innovation (e.g. drug repurposing) after the UK Supreme Court's 2019 decision in Actavis v ICOS; the current and future roles of competition law in controlling drug prices, including an update on Flynn and Pfizer; and the potential effect of Brexit on the trade of medical products. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 5:45 am
Next week the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Glossip v. [read post]
