Search for: "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993), held that the “Frye standard,” i.e., the long dominant legal standard that “expert” testimony must have “general acceptance” in the scientific community or other relevant areas of knowledge, was no longer the legal standard for admitting expert testimony in evidence. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and thus should not have been admitted nor relied upon. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:28 pm by Viking
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissibility of expert testimony. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[2], the Court ruled that Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence did not incorporate the Frye general acceptance test as a basis for assessing scientific testimony. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[2], the Court ruled that Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence did not incorporate the Frye general acceptance test as a basis for assessing scientific testimony. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:29 pm by Scott Koller
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1315 (9th Cir.1995) (“ Daubert II ”). [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:19 am by Bexis
  He didn't file suit, however, until June 2009.Dead to rights under the Texas two-year statute of limitations, plaintiff tried to argue that his claim didn't "accrue" until there was scientific evidence sufficient to satisfy Texas' version of Daubert, which was imposed in Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 11:37 am by Dennis Crouch
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), in allowing testimony from EcoFactor's damages expert. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 12:41 pm by Jim Robinson
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and the testimony is helpful to the trier of fact to understand the evidence through specialized, scientific, or technical expertise. [read post]