Search for: "Doe v. Catholic Relief Services" Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am by O. Carter Snead
  The aim of this contribution is to explore what Hobby Lobby might mean going forward for religious non-profits (such as Catholic universities, hospitals, and social service agencies) seeking relief from the HHS contraceptive mandate. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Law Lady
Some 43 Catholic groups have sued.Professional Services Exclusion: PROPERTY MANAGER GETS NO COVERAGE FOR FATAL APARTMENT FIRE, Golden Eagle Ins. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
 . and does not play an integral and vital part in the overall production or marketing of [products]”); Shepard v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Among other powers, the governor "shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed" (NY Const, art IV, § 3), which "include[s] [*2]the power to enforce and implement legislative enactments" (Under 21, Catholic Home Bur. for Dependent Children v City of New York, 65 NY2d 344, 356 [1985]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Among other powers, the governor "shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed" (NY Const, art IV, § 3), which "include[s] [*2]the power to enforce and implement legislative enactments" (Under 21, Catholic Home Bur. for Dependent Children v City of New York, 65 NY2d 344, 356 [1985]). [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 10:49 am
Finally, the relief he sought under RLUIPA is unavailable to him.In Young v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm by Jim Oleske
Ten weeks ago, acting on an emergency application for injunctive relief in the COVID-19 case of Tandon v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 9:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That Second Circuit ruling has now been stayed by the Supreme Court, which holds that the order likely violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.The case is Roman Catholic Diocese v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Regarding withholding, compulsory military service does not establish a well-founded fear of future persecution unless the applicant would be disproportionately punished for refusing to serve or would be forced to join an internationally condemned military. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Regarding withholding, compulsory military service does not establish a well-founded fear of future persecution unless the applicant would be disproportionately punished for refusing to serve or would be forced to join an internationally condemned military. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:08 am by Brett Holubeck
The case concerned the refusal of Philadelphia to contract with Catholic Social Services (“CSS”) unless CSS agreed to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Ali’s conscientious objection claim: The twists and turns of the administrative process In February 1966, the Selective Service informed Ali that he was, for the first time, eligible for military service. [read post]