Search for: "Donald L. v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
On 14 March 2022, the Supreme Court denied Julian Assange permission to appeal against the High Court’s decision to extradite him to the United State as the application did not raise an arguable point of law. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Katie Porter and Raúl Grijalva sent a letter to six public relations firms, asking for details on their work with energy companies and whether they had aided them in campaigns to obscure the link between fossil fuels and climate change. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
In UFCW v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:29 am
Noble’s Roman’s, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Jackson (election contest): https://electioncases.osu.edu/case/ward-v-jackson/ From the Maricopa County Superior Court Judge’s decision: “The Court finds no misconduct, no fraud, and no effect on the outcome of the election. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
President Donald Trump and his allies flooded social media with false claims of victory and unsupported allegations of voter fraud. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Donald Austin over negligent testimony given as an expert witness in a medical malpractice action. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:54 pm
Miller v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Justice L’Heureux-Dubé invokes his name in the Supreme Court of Canada’s R. v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" eBay v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
Donald v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
The superiority of judges as fact finders in complex scientific cases remains to be shown. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
L. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
L. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:15 am
Here is the abstract: This Article uses the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
